Property taxation: welfare exemption.
Summary
The California Constitution authorizes the Legislature to exempt from taxation property that is used exclusively for religious, hospital, or charitable purposes, and is owned or held in trust by a nonprofit entity. Pursuant to this constitutional authority, existing law partially exempts from property taxation property used exclusively for rental housing and related facilities, if specified criteria are met, including, except in the case of a limited partnership in which the managing general partner is a nonprofit corporation eligible for the exemption, that 90% or more of the occupants of the property are lower income households whose rents do not exceed the rent limits prescribed by a specified law. Existing law limits the total exemption amount allowed to a taxpayer, with respect to a single property or multiple properties for any fiscal year on the sole basis of the application of this criterion, to $20,000 of tax. This bill would increase that total exemption amount allowed to $10,000,000 in assessed value, with respect to lien dates occurring on and after January 1, 2017. This bill would require any outstanding qualified ad valorem tax in excess of the $20,000 limitation, and related interest or penalty, which was levied or imposed on and after January 1, 2013, and before January 1, 2017, with respect to qualified property for which a qualified claim was filed, to be canceled to the extent that the amount canceled does not result in a total exemption amount in excess of $100,000 of tax being allowed to a qualified taxpayer with respect to a single property or multiple properties for any fiscal year. The bill would, on and after January 1, 2017, prohibit an escape assessment from being levied on qualified property if that amount would be subject to cancellation pursuant to this bill. This bill would require a claim for the welfare exemption on qualified property to be accompanied by an affidavit containing specified information regarding the units occupied by lower income households for which the exemption is claimed. By imposing new duties upon county tax officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations regarding the public purpose served by the bill. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code requires the Legislature to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
May 2016
Assembly Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 10, 2016
Signed Sep 29, 2016
Floor votes · Senate May 31, 2016 · Assembly Aug 18, 2016
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
May 31, 2016
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
9
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Sep 29, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 25, 2016
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 5429.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 19, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 18, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (74-0-1)
assembly
Aug 15, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 12, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 11).
lower
Jun 23, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 22, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 20).
lower
Jun 6, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
May 31, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-1)
senate
May 27, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4001.) (May 27).
upper
May 2, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 30, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3334.) (March 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 8, 2016
Upper · Passed
March 16 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 18, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Feb 10, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jerry Hill
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 996
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 996. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline