Vietnamese rice cakes.
Summary
Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, requires all manufacturers of Korean rice cakes, as defined, to place a label issued by the Korean Rice Cake Association Corporation on the Korean rice cake that indicates the date of manufacture, and requires the label to include a statement that the rice cake must be consumed within one day of manufacture. A violation of these provisions is a crime. This bill would require, except as provided, a manufacturer of Vietnamese rice cakes, as defined, to place a label, designed by the Vietnamese Rice Cake Association, Inc., on the Vietnamese rice cake that indicates the date and time the cooking process was completed, and would require the label to include a statement that the rice cake must be consumed within 24 hours of the date and time printed on the label. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law, the California Retail Food Code, provides for the regulation of health and sanitation standards for food facilities, as defined, by the State Department of Public Health. Under existing law, local health agencies are primarily responsible for enforcing the California Retail Food Code. A violation of these provisions is a crime. Existing law authorizes a food facility to sell Korean rice cakes, as defined, that have been at room temperature for no more than 24 hours, and requires, at the end of the operating day, Korean rice cakes that have been at room temperature for no more than 24 hours to be destroyed in a manner approved by the enforcement agency. This bill would also authorize a food facility to sell Vietnamese rice cakes that have been at no more than 70 degrees Fahrenheit for no more than 24 hours and would require Vietnamese rice cakes that have been at no more than 70 degrees Fahrenheit but have been stored for more than 24 hours to be destroyed in a manner approved by the enforcement agency. By imposing new enforcement requirements on local health agencies, and by creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
May 2016
Assembly Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Aug 2016
Introduced Feb 8, 2016
Signed Aug 25, 2016
Floor votes · Senate May 9, 2016 · Assembly Aug 4, 2016
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 33
May 9, 2016
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
8
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Aug 25, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 11, 2016
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4866.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 4, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-3)
assembly
Aug 4, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 29, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (June 29).
lower
Jun 21, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 20, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 14).
lower
May 27, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
May 16, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
May 9, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-1)
senate
Apr 25, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 12, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 11, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3445.) (April 6).
upper
Mar 15, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Feb 18, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Feb 8, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 12 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Janet Nguyen
RRepublican
Co
Bob Huff
RRepublican
Co
DW
Das Williams
DDemocratic
Co
Donald Wagner
RRepublican
Co
Jim Beall
DDemocratic
Co
Kansen Chu
DDemocratic
Co
Kevin McCarty
DDemocratic
Co
Ling Ling Chang
RRepublican
Co
Matthew Harper
RRepublican
Co
Nora Campos
DDemocratic
Co
Tom Daly
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 969
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 969. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline