Dependency proceedings: relative caregivers.
Summary
Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge a child to be a dependent of the court under certain circumstances, including when the child suffered, or there is a substantial risk that the child will suffer, serious physical harm, or a parent fails to provide the child with adequate food, clothing, shelter, or medical treatment. Existing law establishes the grounds for removal of a dependent child from the custody of his or her parents or guardian, and establishes procedures to determine placement of a dependent child. Existing law prescribes various hearings, including specified review hearings, and other procedures for these purposes. Existing law requires a social worker to conduct specified assessments for purposes of placement. This bill would require the court to order the social worker to immediately conduct an assessment, as specified, if the child is not placed with a relative at the time of the initial hearing and an able and willing relative is available and requests temporary placement of the child. Under existing law, if a child is proposed to be placed in the home of a relative, or the home of any prospective guardian or other person who is not a licensed or certified foster parent, the court or social worker placing the child is required to make an assessment of that person for placement pursuant to specified criteria, including conducting a home visit and having a state-level criminal records check conducted by an appropriate government agency through the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System. For purposes of placement, existing law authorizes a county to issue a criminal records exemption for a qualifying crime for which the relative, prospective guardian, or other person has been convicted only if that county has been granted permission by the Director of Social Services to issue exemptions. Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services to conduct an evaluation of the implementation provisions relating to criminal records exemptions, as specified. This bill would require a county seeking to issue a criminal records exemption under these provisions to assist the relative, prospective guardian, or other person in locating and obtaining any documents required for the criminal records exemption. If the court orders the county to make an assessment under these provisions, the bill would also require the county to complete the assessment process within a specified timeframe. The bill would authorize the court to conduct a hearing if the assessment is not complete, as specified, or an exemption or waiver is denied, to determine if the county has abused its discretion. By imposing additional duties on county welfare agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
Jun 2016
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 3, 2016
Last action Aug 11, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2016
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
Jun 2, 2016
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
6
Committee
12
Amendments
1
Aug 11, 2016
Lower · Passed
August 11 hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Aug 1, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 29, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 21, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Jun 15, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 9, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and HUM. S.
lower
Jun 2, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0)
senate
May 31, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
May 27, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4000.) (May 27).
upper
Apr 19, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 18, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3519.) (April 12).
upper
Mar 31, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 30, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 3311.) (March 29).
upper
Feb 18, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and JUD.
upper
Feb 3, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CL
Carol Liu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 942
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 942. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline