Continuing care contracts: cancellation: payments.
Summary
Existing law requires a continuing care retirement facility, as defined, to possess a certificate of authority issued by the State Department of Social Services before it can enter into a continuing care contract, as defined. Existing law requires that a continuing care contract be in writing and contain specified information. Existing law provides that a continuing care contract may be canceled without cause by written notice from either party within 90 days of the resident's initial occupancy. Existing law requires a provider to pay, during the cancellation period, all refunds owed to a resident within 14 days after a resident makes possession of the living unit available to the provider. Existing law requires a provider to pay a lump-sum payment that is conditioned upon resale of a unit to a resident within 14 days after resale of the unit. This bill would define a repayable contract as a continuing care contract that includes a promise to repay all or a portion of an entrance fee that is conditioned upon reoccupancy or resale of the unit previously occupied by the resident. The bill would require any amount owed that is not paid to a resident or the resident's estate within 180 days after termination of a repayable contract to accrue simple interest at a rate of 4% until the full amount owed is paid. The bill would require any amount owed that is not paid to a resident or the resident's estate within 240 days after termination of a repayable contract to accrue simple interest at a rate of 6% until the full amount owed is paid. The bill would require any amount owed that is not paid to a resident or the resident's estate within one year after the 240-day period to accrue compound interest annually at a rate of 6% until the amount owed is paid. The bill would provide that the above-mentioned provisions apply only to repayable contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2017. The bill would provide that, until January 1, 2018, these provisions do not apply to specified projects that are in development prior to January 1, 2017, provided that the initial contract for the project is entered into on or before January 1, 2018. The bill would provide that the repayment by a provider of all or a portion of an entrance fee before the resale of a unit would not subject any other entrance fee to the refund reserve requirements, except as provided. The bill would make corresponding changes to require a continuing care contract to contain a statement that a provider is prohibited from charging the resident or his or her estate a monthly fee once a unit has been permanently vacated by the resident, unless the fee is part of an equity interest contract. The bill would also require a continuing care contract that provides for a refund or repayment of a lump sum of all or part of the entrance fee to include a statement that the provider will make a good-faith effort to reoccupy or resell a unit for which a lump-sum payment is conditioned upon resale of the unit.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Jun 2016
Senate Passage
Apr 2016
Assembly Passage
Jun 2016
Signed into Law
Jul 2016
Introduced Feb 3, 2016
Signed Jul 25, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Apr 18, 2016 · Assembly Jun 27, 2016
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 35
Apr 18, 2016
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican11
54% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Jul 25, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 30, 2016
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4637.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jun 27, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (48-21-6)
assembly
Jun 27, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 22, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (June 21).
lower
Jun 16, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on AGING & L.T.C.
lower
Jun 15, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on AGING & L.T.C. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 14).
lower
Jun 8, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
May 12, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUM. S. and AGING & L.T.C.
lower
Apr 18, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-5)
senate
Apr 14, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Apr 13, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 3. Noes 0. Page 3518.) (April 12).
upper
Feb 18, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Feb 3, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Monning
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 939
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 939. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline