Contracts: design professionals: indemnity.
Summary
Existing law makes specified provisions in construction contracts void and unenforceable, including provisions that purport to indemnify the promisee against liability for damages for death or bodily injury to persons, injury to property, or any other loss arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the promisee or the promisee's agents who are directly responsible to the promisee, or for defects in design furnished by those persons. This bill would specify, with certain exceptions, for contracts and amendments to them entered into on or after January 1, 2017, that a design professional, as defined, only has the duty to defend himself or herself from claims or lawsuits that arise out of, or pertain or relate to, negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the design professional. The bill would prohibit these provisions from being construed to affect any duty of a design professional to defend any claims brought against him or her on an ongoing basis during their pendency or the design professional's obligation to reimburse reasonable defense costs incurred by other persons or entities, limited to the design professional's degree of fault, as determined by a court, arbitration, or negotiated settlement. The bill would provide that contracts and solicitation documents are deemed to incorporate its provisions by reference and would define claim to include a demand for money or services, lawsuit, or demand for arbitration. The bill would prohibit waiver of these provisions and would provide that any clause, covenant, or agreement contained in, collateral to, or affecting a contract that requires a design professional to defend claims or lawsuits against other persons or entities is void and unenforceable. The bill would provide legislative findings and declarations in support of these provisions.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2016
Committee Review
Jun 2016
Senate Passage
Jun 2016
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 19, 2016
Last action Jul 12, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2016
How they voted
23–3
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 33
Jun 1, 2016
D
Democratic23
65% Yea
R
Republican10
80% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
3
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Jun 16, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 9, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 1, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-3-7)
senate
May 10, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
May 9, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3766.) (May 3).
upper
Apr 18, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jan 28, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jan 19, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Lois Wolk
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 885
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 885. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline