Solemnization of marriage: county sheriff.
Summary
Existing law authorizes specified individuals to solemnize a marriage, including, among others, an authorized person of any religious denomination, a judge or magistrate, a current Member of the Legislature or constitutional officer of this state, and a current Member of Congress of the United States who represents a district within this state, as specified. Existing law additionally authorizes a county supervisor, a city clerk, and a mayor, as specified, to solemnize a marriage, while that person holds office. Existing law requires the county supervisor, city clerk, or mayor to obtain and review from the county clerk all available instructions for marriage solemnization before that person first solemnizes a marriage. This bill would additionally authorize a county sheriff, while that person holds office, to solemnize a marriage. The bill would delete the requirement that county supervisors, city clerks, and elected mayors obtain and review all available instructions for marriage solemnization before first solemnizing a marriage. The bill would make conforming changes. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 400 of the Family Code proposed by AB 2761, that would become operative only if AB 2761 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2017, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
Jun 2016
Assembly Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Aug 2016
Introduced Jan 14, 2016
Signed Aug 26, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 11, 2016 · Assembly Aug 4, 2016
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 39
Aug 11, 2016
D
Democratic26
92% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Aug 26, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 11, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (37-0-2)
senate
Aug 11, 2016
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4880.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 4, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (74-0-4)
assembly
Aug 4, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 30, 2016
Upper · Passed
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read a third time, passed, and ordered to the Senate.
upper
Jun 16, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 9, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 8).
lower
Jun 1, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 19, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 4, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3766.) (May 3).
upper
Mar 16, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 8, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jan 28, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jan 14, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 875
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 875. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline