Local law enforcement: supplemental services.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the county board of supervisors on behalf of the sheriff, and the legislative body of any city on behalf of the chief of police, to contract to provide supplemental law enforcement services to private individuals, private entities, and private corporations in specified circumstances and subject to certain conditions. Among those conditions are that the services shall be rendered by regularly appointed full-time peace officers, as defined, and that, prior to contracting for ongoing services to private corporations or private entities, the board of supervisors or legislative body, as applicable, shall discuss the contract and the legal requirements of those contracts at a duly noticed public hearing. This bill would extend that authorization with respect to providing supplemental law enforcement services to private schools, private colleges, or private universities on an occasional or ongoing basis. The bill would authorize these services to be rendered by any category of peace officer, as specified. The bill would require, prior to contracting for these ongoing services to be provided to a private school, private college, or private university, the board of supervisors or legislative body, as applicable, to discuss the contract and the legal requirements of those contracts at a duly noticed public hearing. The bill would specify that certain public university and college police departments certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training are not prevented from entering into agreements with private schools, private colleges, or private universities to provide law enforcement services.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Jan 14, 2016
Signed Sep 14, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Apr 7, 2016 · Assembly Aug 25, 2016
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 33
Apr 7, 2016
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Sep 14, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2016
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 5475.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 25, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-1)
assembly
Aug 25, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 18, 2016
Upper · Passed
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read a third time, passed and ordered to the Senate.
upper
Aug 4, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 30, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (June 29).
lower
May 19, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 28, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 7, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-1)
senate
Apr 5, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3395.) (April 5).
upper
Jan 28, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jan 14, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Isadore Hall
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 872
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 872. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline