English language education: English learners.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires each school district that has one or more pupils who are English learners, and, to the extent required by federal law, a county office of education and a charter school, to assess the English language development of each of those pupils in order to determine the pupil's level of proficiency. Existing law requires the State Department of Education, with the approval of the State Board of Education, to establish procedures for conducting the assessment and for the reclassification of a pupil from English learner to English proficient. Existing law defines "long-term English learner" as an English learner who is enrolled in any of grades 6 to 12, inclusive, has been enrolled in schools in the United States for more than 6 years, has remained at the same English language proficiency level for 2 or more consecutive years as determined by a specified English language development test, or any successor test, and scores far below basic or below basic on a certain English language arts standards-based achievement test, or any successor test. This bill would revise that definition to instead mean, except as specified, an English learner who is enrolled in any of grades 6 to 12, inclusive, who has been enrolled in schools in the United States for 6 years or more, has remained at the same English language proficiency level for 2 or more consecutive prior years, or has regressed to a lower English language proficiency level, as determined by the specified English language development test, or a score determined by the Superintendent of Public Instruction on any successor test, and, for a pupil in any of grades 6 to 9, inclusive, scored far below basic or below basic on the specified English language arts standards-based achievement test, or a score determined by the Superintendent on any successor test. The bill would encourage the Superintendent to revisit the score determined for any successor test after 3 years of assessment data on the successor test. (2) Existing law defines an "English learner at risk of becoming a long-term English learner" as an English learner who is enrolled in any of grades 5 to 11, inclusive, in schools in the United States for 4 years, scores at the intermediate level or below on the specified English language development test, or any successor test, and scores in the 4th year at the below basic or far below basic level on a certain English language arts standards-based achievement test, or any successor test. This bill would revise that definition to instead mean, except as specified, an English learner who is enrolled in any of grades 3 to 12, inclusive, in schools in the United States for 4 to 5 years, scored at the intermediate level or below on the specified English language development test, or a score determined by the Superintendent on any successor test, and, for a pupil in any of grades 3 to 9, inclusive, scored in the 4th or 5th year at the below basic or far below basic level on the specified English language arts standards-based achievement test, or a score determined by the Superintendent on any successor test. The bill would encourage the Superintendent to revisit the score determined for any successor test after 3 years of assessment data on the successor test. (3) Existing law requires the department to annually ascertain and provide to school districts and schools the number of pupils in each school district and school, as specified, who are, or are at risk of becoming, long-term English learners. This bill would also require the department to post on the department's Internet Web site the number of long-term English learners and English learners at risk of becoming long-term English learners in the state.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Senate Passage
May 2015
Assembly Passage
Sep 2015
Signed into Law
Oct 2015
Introduced Feb 27, 2015
Signed Oct 8, 2015
Floor votes · Senate May 18, 2015 · Assembly Sep 3, 2015
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 39
May 18, 2015
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican14
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Oct 8, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 4, 2015
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2501.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 3, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (77-0-1)
assembly
Sep 3, 2015
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 8, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (July 8).
lower
Jun 18, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 1, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
May 18, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0-3)
senate
May 12, 2015
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
May 11, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.
upper
Apr 15, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 14, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 523.) (April 8).
upper
Mar 19, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Feb 27, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TM
Tony Mendoza
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 750
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 750. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline