Escrow agents.
Summary
The Escrow Law requires the licensing of escrow agents by the Commissioner of Business Oversight, and further requires licensees to participate as members of the Escrow Agents' Fidelity Corporation, a nonprofit corporation established to pay members for loss of trust fund obligations, as specified. The law requires a licensed escrow agent to maintain a bond based on the previous year's average annual trust fund obligations, as specified. This bill would make findings and declarations regarding the role of Fidelity Corporation to support and enhance trust in licensed escrow agents, and specify that Fidelity Corporation is required to indemnify a member escrow agent against loss in accordance with the Escrow Law. The bill would state the intent of the Legislature for the commissioner to utilize the services of private 3rd parties, with prior escrow or escrow conservation, liquidation, or receivership experience, who are independent of the department to perform conservation, liquidation, and receiver functions, and would require the full amount of any penalty revenue, up to $125,000 at any one time, as specified, to be available for use by the commissioner to compensate an appointed conservator, liquidator, or receiver. The bill would also authorize the commissioner to utilize all or a portion of the bond or other required obligations, and all or a portion of a licensee's assets remaining following conservation, liquidation, or receivership to compensate an appointed conservator, liquidator, or receiver. By making this penalty revenue and other revenue available to the commissioner in this regard, this bill would make an appropriation.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2015
Senate Passage
Jun 2015
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 27, 2015
Last action Aug 27, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2015
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
Jun 2, 2015
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
4
Committee
7
Aug 27, 2015
Lower · Passed
August 27 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Jul 7, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 18, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Jun 2, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0)
senate
May 28, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1159.) (May 28).
upper
May 5, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 4, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 813.) (April 29).
upper
Mar 19, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
upper
Feb 27, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Andy Vidak
RRepublican
Co
Marty Block
DDemocratic
Co
Mike Morrell
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 736
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 736. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline