New evidence: habeas corpus: motion to vacate judgment: indemnity.
Summary
Existing law allows every person who is unlawfully imprisoned or restrained of his or her liberty to prosecute a writ of habeas corpus to inquire into the cause of his or her imprisonment or restraint. Existing law allows a writ of habeas corpus to be prosecuted for, but not limited to, false evidence that is substantially material or probative to the issue of guilt or punishment that was introduced at trial and false physical evidence which was a material factor directly related to the plea of guilty of the person. This bill would additionally allow a writ of habeas corpus to be prosecuted on the basis of new evidence that is credible, material, presented without substantial delay, and of such decisive force and value that it would have more likely than not changed the outcome at trial. Existing law requires the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board to recommend an appropriation be made by the Legislature for the purpose of indemnifying a person if the evidence shows that a crime with which the person was charged was either not committed at all, or, if committed, was not committed by that person. Existing law requires that the appropriation recommended shall be a sum equivalent to $100 per day of incarceration served subsequent to the person's conviction. If a court grants a writ of habeas corpus or vacates a judgment on the basis of new evidence and finds that the new evidence points unerringly to innocence, existing law requires the board to recommend an appropriation to the Legislature pursuant to these provisions without a hearing. This bill would require the board to recommend an appropriation to the Legislature if the court finds that the person is factually innocent. The bill would make additional clarifying and technical changes.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2015
Senate Passage
Jun 2015
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 27, 2015
Last action Aug 27, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2015
How they voted
20–12
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 33
Jun 2, 2015
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
4
Committee
10
Aug 27, 2015
Lower · Passed
August 27 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Aug 19, 2015
Lower · Passed
August 19 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Aug 17, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 16, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 14, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 2, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 18, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 2, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-12-1)
senate
May 28, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1159.) (May 28).
upper
Apr 22, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 731.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 19, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 27, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 694
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 694. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline