Gambling: California Gambling Control Commission.
Summary
Existing law, the Gambling Control Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of various legalized gambling activities and establishments by the California Gambling Control Commission and the investigation and enforcement of those activities and establishments by the Department of Justice. The act specifies qualifications for eligibility as a member of the commission and provides that a person is ineligible for appointment if, within 2 years prior to appointment, the person was employed by, retained by, or derived substantial income from, a gambling establishment. The act prohibits a member of the commission, the executive director, the chief, and any employee of the commission or department designated by regulation, for a period of 3 years after leaving office or terminating employment, for compensation, from acting as agent or attorney for any other person before the commission or the department if the appearance or communication is for the purpose of influencing administrative action, as specified. A person who willfully violates any provision of the act for which a penalty is not expressly provided is guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill would additionally prohibit a member of the commission, the executive director, the chief, and any employee of the commission or department, for a period of 2 years after leaving office or terminating employment, from holding a direct or indirect interest in, holding employment with, representing, appearing for, or negotiating on behalf of, a gambling establishment, gambling enterprise, registrant, or licensee. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
May 2015
Assembly Passage
Aug 2016
Vetoed
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 27, 2015
Vetoed Sep 23, 2016
Floor votes · Senate May 11, 2015 · Assembly Aug 11, 2016
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 34
May 11, 2015
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
5
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Sep 23, 2016
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 23, 2016
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 24, 2016
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 5371.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 23, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 11, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (73-0-2)
assembly
Aug 11, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 3, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (August 3).
lower
Jun 29, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 9, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (July 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 16, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
May 22, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
May 11, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-2)
senate
Apr 27, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 14, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 592.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 19, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Feb 27, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Andy Vidak
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 692
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 692. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline