Courts.
Summary
The Trial Court Employment Protection and Governance Act establishes a trial court employee personnel system that provides authority to hire trial court personnel, regulates the classification and compensation of trial court employees, labor relations, and personnel files, and requires each trial court to establish a system of employment selection and advancement and an employment protection system. Existing law authorizes state agencies to use personal services contracts to achieve cost savings if specified standards are satisfied, including, among other things, the contract does not cause the displacement of civil service employees and the contract is awarded through a publicized, competitive bidding process. The State Personnel Board is required to review a proposed contract upon the request of an employee organization for compliance with those standards. This bill would establish specified standards if a trial court intends to enter into a contract for any services that are currently or customarily performed by that trial court's employees. Among other things, the bill would require the trial court to clearly demonstrate that the proposed contract will result in actual overall cost savings to the trial court. The bill would provide that those standards do not apply to a contract under certain circumstances, including, among others, when the services are incidental to a contract for the purchase or lease of real or personal property. This bill would provide that its provisions are severable.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Senate Passage
Jun 2015
Assembly Passage
Sep 2015
Vetoed
Apr 2016
Introduced Feb 27, 2015
Vetoed Apr 25, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2015 · Assembly Sep 2, 2015
How they voted
21–11
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 33
Jun 2, 2015
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Apr 25, 2016
Vetoed
Last day to consider Governors veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
upper
Oct 11, 2015
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 11, 2015
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 3, 2015
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 25. Noes 13. Page 2445.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 2, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (46-26)
assembly
Sep 2, 2015
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 31, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 27).
lower
Jun 24, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 23, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (June 23).
lower
Jun 18, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 2, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-11-1)
senate
May 28, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1158.) (May 28).
upper
May 5, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 4, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 820.) (April 28).
upper
Mar 19, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 27, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 682
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 682. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline