Minor or nonminor dependent parents: reunification services.
Summary
(1) Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge children to be dependents of the court under certain circumstances, including when the child suffered or there is a substantial risk that the child will suffer serious physical harm, or a parent fails to provide the child with adequate food, clothing, shelter, or medical treatment. Existing law establishes the grounds for removal of a dependent child from the custody of his or her parents or guardian, and establishes procedures to determine temporary placement of a dependent child. When a court orders the removal of a child from the physical custody of his or her parent, existing law generally requires the court to order the return of the child to the physical custody of his or her parent at the review hearings held 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months, respectively, after the initial disposition hearing, unless the court finds that the return of the child would create a substantial risk of detriment, or substantial danger, to the safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being of the child. In making this determination, existing law requires the court to consider the efforts or progress, or both, demonstrated by the parent and the extent to which he or she availed himself or herself of reunification services, taking into account the particular barriers to an incarcerated, institutionalized, detained, or deported parent's or guardian's access to those court-mandated reunification services and ability to maintain contact with his or her child. This bill would require the court, in making its determination at those review hearings, to take into account the particular barriers to a minor parent or a nonminor dependent parent. (2) If a child is not returned to a parent or legal guardian at the 18-month permanency review hearing and the court determines by clear and convincing evidence that the best interests of the child would be met by the provision of additional reunification services to the parent or legal guardian, as specified, existing law authorizes the court to continue the case for up to 6 months for a subsequent permanency review hearing, as specified. This bill would authorize the court to continue the case for up to 6 months for the provision of additional reunification services to a minor parent or a nonminor dependent parent at the initial hearing who is making significant and consistent progress in establishing a safe home for the child's return for a subsequent permanency review hearing.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2015
Senate Passage
Jun 2015
Assembly Passage
Aug 2015
Signed into Law
Sep 2015
Introduced Jan 8, 2015
Signed Sep 9, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Jun 4, 2015 · Assembly Aug 20, 2015
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
Jun 4, 2015
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Sep 9, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2015
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2205.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 20, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-1)
assembly
Aug 20, 2015
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 15, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 14).
lower
Jun 24, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Jun 23, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 23).
lower
Jun 11, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and HUM. S.
lower
Jun 4, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0)
senate
Jun 2, 2015
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Jun 1, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1147.) (May 28).
upper
Apr 8, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 525.) (April 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 26, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 5, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jan 8, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CL
Carol Liu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 68
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 68. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline