Water: urban water management planning.
Summary
Existing law, the Urban Water Management Planning Act, requires every urban water supplier to prepare and adopt an urban water management plan for submission to the Department of Water Resources and other entities that includes specified content, including an urban water shortage contingency analysis. Existing law requires this analysis to include actions to be undertaken by the urban water supplier to prepare for, and implement during, a catastrophic interruption of water supplies, including an earthquake. Existing law requires an urban water supplier to update its plan at least once every 5 years on or before December 31, in years ending in 5 and 0, except that the 2015 plan is required to be updated and submitted to the department by July 1, 2016. This bill would require an urban water supplier to include within its plan, beginning January 1, 2020, a seismic risk assessment and mitigation plan to assess the vulnerability of each of the various facilities of a water system and mitigate those vulnerabilities. This bill would authorize an urban water supplier to comply with this requirement by submitting a copy of the most recent adopted local hazard mitigation plan or multihazard mitigation plan under specified federal law that addresses seismic risk.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Senate Passage
Jun 2015
Assembly Passage
Sep 2015
Signed into Law
Oct 2015
Introduced Feb 27, 2015
Signed Oct 9, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Jun 3, 2015 · Assembly Sep 1, 2015
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
Jun 3, 2015
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
8
Committee
11
Amendments
2
Oct 9, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 2, 2015
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2424.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 1, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-9)
assembly
Sep 1, 2015
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 1.) (August 27).
lower
Jun 30, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 2.) (June 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 24, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on W., P., & W.
lower
Jun 18, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on W., P., & W.
lower
Jun 3, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0)
senate
Jun 2, 2015
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Jun 1, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1158.) (May 28).
upper
Apr 30, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 29, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 821.) (April 28).
upper
Apr 16, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Apr 6, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 12, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 27, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Robert M. Hertzberg
DDemocratic
Co
Jerry Hill
DDemocratic
Co
Nora Campos
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 664
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 664. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline