Real estate investments: securities: qualification exemption.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the Real Estate Law, requires any transaction that involves the sale of, or an offer to sell, a note secured directly by an interest in one or more parcels of real property, or the sale of an undivided interest in a note secured directly by one or more parcels of real property, to comply with specified requirements. Existing law limits, to the allowable percentage of the current market value of a property, as specified, the aggregate principal amount of the note or interest sold. Existing law requires a broker to make reasonable efforts to ensure the offer or sale of notes or interest in notes to be secured by a lien on real property or a business opportunity, meets certain criteria, including, among others, that the investment in the notes is suitable and appropriate for the purchaser. To meet this requirement, a broker may obtain a completed investor questionnaire from each person to whom the broker offers or sells the notes and deeds of trust. This bill would modify the allowable percentage of the current market value that can be sold, as specified. The bill would require the investor questionnaire to be completed within a specific time before the sale, modify the requirement for subsequent questionnaires, and remove the necessity of a broker obtaining an annually updated completed investor questionnaire from each person to whom the broker offered or sold notes and deeds of trust. The bill would update the address of the Real Estate Commissioner on a required notice. (2) Existing law, the Corporate Securities Law of 1968, provides that it is unlawful to offer or sell any security in this state unless the offer and sale of the security has been qualified with the Commissioner of Business Oversight, or the security or transaction is exempt from qualification. That law also provides that all offers and sales of a security are subject to antifraud provisions, which require information provided to offerees and purchasers to be true and to not omit any material facts necessary to prevent the statements made from being misleading. That law requires an issuer engaged in the business of purchasing, selling, financing, or brokering real estate, that relies on specified transactions exemptions or a securities exemption from qualification for an offering that involves the offer or sale of securities to a person who is not an accredited investor to provide additional information to the Commissioner of Business Oversight regarding the nature of the proposed offering on a form prescribed by the commissioner. This bill would remove from these requirements to provide additional information to the commissioner, an offering of securities that relies on an exemption for a security that is a promissory note secured by a lien on real property, which is neither one of a series of notes of equal priority secured by interests in the same real property nor a note in which beneficial interests are sold to more than one person or entity.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2015
Senate Passage
May 2015
Assembly Passage
Aug 2015
Signed into Law
Sep 2015
Introduced Feb 27, 2015
Signed Sep 3, 2015
Floor votes · Senate May 18, 2015 · Assembly Aug 20, 2015
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 34
May 18, 2015
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Sep 3, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2015
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2206.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 20, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (74-0-1)
assembly
Aug 20, 2015
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 15, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (July 15).
lower
Jun 25, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 24, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 22).
lower
Jun 1, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
May 18, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-2)
senate
May 11, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 29, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 819.) (April 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 15, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 617.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 7, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
upper
Mar 12, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and JUD.
upper
Feb 27, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike Morrell
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 647
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 647. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline