Medi-Cal: federally qualified health centers: rural health clinics: managed care contracts.
Summary
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income persons receive health care benefits. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid provisions. Existing law provides that federally qualified health center (FQHC) services and rural health clinic (RHC) services, as defined, are covered benefits under the Medi-Cal program to be reimbursed, to the extent that federal financial participation is obtained, to providers on a per-visit basis. Existing law authorizes an FQHC or RHC to apply for an adjustment to its per-visit rate, based on a change in the scope of services provided, as prescribed. Existing law establishes alternative ratesetting procedures with respect to a new entity that first qualifies as an FQHC or RHC in the year 2001 or later, a newly licensed facility at a new location added to an existing FQHC or RHC or an existing FQHC or RHC that is relocated. Two of the procedures are referred to as comparability approaches, based on the rates of 3 similarly situated FQHCs and RHCs. The 3rd procedure requires, at a new entity's one-time election, that the department establish the reimbursement rate, calculated on a per-visit basis, that equals 100% of the projected allowable costs to the FQHC or RHC of furnishing services during its first 12 months of operation as an FQHC or RHC. This bill would require the department to finalize a new rate within 1 year after an FQHC's or RHC's submission of a scope-of-service rate change. With respect to a new FQHC or RHC that has elected for the department to establish its reimbursement rate based on projected allowable costs as described above, this bill would require the department to finalize that rate within 1 year after the submission of the actual cost report from the first full 12 months of operation, as specified. This bill would revise the department's responsibilities with respect to a new entity or a relocated FQHC or RHC that selects either of the comparability approaches. The bill would require the department to review the comparable facilities to determine if any of them do not meet the comparability threshold and, if so, to notify the new entity, and request a supplemental submission, as prescribed. The bill would require the department to conduct an initial review of a scope-of-service rate change request within 30 days after submission by the FQHC or RHC, and notify the FQHC or RHC by the 31st day after submission if the department determines that additional information is necessary, as prescribed. The bill would require the department to finalize the FQHC's or RHC's rate within 1 year after receiving a submission the department determines to be complete. This bill would require the department to correct erroneous payments at least quarterly to reprocess past claims and ensure all claims are reimbursed at the appropriate finalized new rate. Existing law requires the department to administer a program to ensure that total payments to FQHCs and RHCs operating as managed care subcontractors comply with applicable federal law regarding payment for services provided by FQHCs and RHCs. Under the department's program, existing law requires FQHCs and RHCs subcontracting with specified managed care plans to seek supplemental reimbursement from the department through a per visit fee-for-service billing system. To be reimbursed under these provisions, existing law requires each FQHC and RHC to submit to the department for approval a rate differential based on the FQHC's or RHC's reasonable cost or the prospective payment rate. Within 6 months of the end of the FQHC's or RHC's fiscal year, existing law requires, to the extent feasible, the department to perform an annual reconciliation to reasonable cost, and make payments to, or obtain recovery from, the FQHC or RHC. This bill would impose various requirements on the department regarding the reconciliation process described above. The bill would require the department to complete the final reconciliation review and pay to the center or clinic any remaining amount owed within 18 months after the last date of the fiscal year for which the department is conducting the review. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 14132.100 of the Welfare and Institutions Code made by this bill and AB 858 to take effect if both bills are chaptered and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Senate Passage
Jun 2015
Assembly Passage
Sep 2015
Vetoed
Apr 2016
Introduced Feb 27, 2015
Vetoed Apr 25, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2015 · Assembly Sep 10, 2015
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
Jun 2, 2015
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Apr 25, 2016
Vetoed
Last day to consider Governors veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
upper
Oct 10, 2015
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 10, 2015
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 11, 2015
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2759.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 10, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (72-0)
assembly
Sep 10, 2015
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 27).
lower
Jul 14, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 13, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (June 30).
lower
Jun 18, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Jun 2, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0)
senate
May 28, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1157.) (May 28).
upper
Apr 28, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 27, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 758.) (April 22).
upper
Apr 6, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Mar 12, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Feb 27, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Pan
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 610
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 610. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline