School facilities: school district advisory committee: use or disposition of school buildings: school closures.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the governing board of any school district, and, prior to the sale, lease, or rental of any excess real property, except rentals not exceeding 30 days, requires the governing board of any school district, to appoint a school district advisory committee to advise the governing board of the school district in the development of districtwide policies and procedures governing the use or disposition of school buildings or space in school buildings which is not needed for school purposes. Existing law requires a school district advisory committee to consist of at least 7 but not more than 11 members, as provided, and specifies the duties of a school district advisory committee. This bill would require the governing board of a school district to also appoint a school district advisory committee before closing a school within the school district to advise the governing board of the school district regarding the closure of the school. If a school district advisory committee is created to advise the governing board of a school district regarding the closure of a school, the bill also would require the appointment of a cross section of community members, including pupil representatives, who have an interest in, and who may be affected by, the school closure to the school district advisory committee. The bill would require a school district advisory committee created for that purpose to be involved in the factfinding necessary for an informal recommendation regarding the school closure, as specified. By imposing additional duties on the governing board of a school district, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
May 2015
Senate Passage
Jun 2015
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 26, 2015
Last action Feb 1, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2015
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
Jun 2, 2015
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
3
Committee
5
Jun 2, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0)
senate
May 28, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1156.) (May 28).
upper
Apr 22, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 21, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 647.) (April 15).
upper
Apr 6, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Mar 12, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Feb 26, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Pan
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 572
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 572. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline