Workers' compensation: utilization review.
Summary
Existing law requires every employer, for purposes of workers' compensation, to establish a utilization review process to prospectively, retrospectively, or concurrently review requests by physicians for authorization to provide recommended medical treatment to injured employees. Existing law establishes timeframes for an employer to make a determination regarding a physician's request. Existing law requires the utilization review process to be governed by written policies and procedures, and requires that these policies and procedures be filed with the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation and disclosed by the employer to employees, physicians, and the public upon request. This bill would prohibit the employer, or any entity conducting utilization review on behalf of the employer, from offering or providing any financial incentive or consideration to a physician based on the number of modifications, delays, or denials made by the physician. The bill would authorize the administrative director to review any compensation agreement, payment schedule, or contract between the employer, or any entity conducting utilization review on behalf of the employer, and the utilization review physician. The bill would make any information disclosed to the administrative director confidential and not subject to public disclosure, except as specified. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
Jan 2016
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 26, 2015
Last action Aug 31, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jan 26, 2016
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Jan 26, 2016
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
37
Key actions
6
Committee
16
Aug 12, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (August 11).
lower
Jun 23, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 22, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 22).
lower
Jun 15, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Apr 28, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Jan 26, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Jan 21, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 2934.) (January 21).
upper
Jan 13, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 2896.) (January 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 6, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Jan 4, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jan 4, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 28, 2015
Upper · Passed
May 28 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
May 4, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 30, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Apr 29, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 820.) (April 29).
upper
Apr 13, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Mar 12, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Feb 26, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Pan
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 563
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 563. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline