Local government: auditors: independence.
Summary
Existing law requires, with certain exceptions, that all city, county, city and county, and district employees who conduct audits or that conduct audit activities of those respective agencies, conduct their work under the general and specified standards prescribed by the Institute of Internal Auditors or the Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, as appropriate. Those standards generally provide, among other things, that auditors should be independent of the activities they audit. Existing law makes every willful omission to perform any duty enjoined by law upon any public officer, or person holding any public trust or employment, where no special provision is made for the punishment of that delinquency, a crime. This bill would prohibit the general counsel of the city, county, city and county, or district, or the employees of the general counsel from having direct oversight over the city, county, city and county, and district employees that conduct audits or that conduct audit activities of those respective agencies. By expanding the definition of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2015
Senate Passage
Apr 2015
Assembly Passage
Jul 2015
Vetoed
Apr 2016
Introduced Feb 26, 2015
Vetoed Apr 18, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Apr 30, 2015 · Assembly Jul 16, 2015
How they voted
27–0
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 34
Apr 30, 2015
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican11
45% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
6
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Apr 18, 2016
Vetoed
Last day to consider Governors veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
upper
Sep 4, 2015
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 4, 2015
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 20, 2015
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2105.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jul 16, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-5)
assembly
Jul 16, 2015
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 8, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (July 8).
lower
Jun 18, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 17, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 17).
lower
May 14, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 30, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-0-7)
senate
Apr 27, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 15, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 618.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 8, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Apr 6, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Mar 12, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Feb 26, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ben Hueso
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 481
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 481. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline