California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System: pupils of military families.
Summary
Existing law establishes the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System, as provided, and requires the system to have specified characteristics, including, among other things, the capability to monitor pupil achievement on certain tests and the high school exit examination from year to year and school to school. Existing law also ratifies the Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children with the purpose of removing barriers to educational success imposed on children of military families due to the frequent moves and deployment of their parents. This bill would require, on or before July 1, 2016, the Superintendent of Public Instruction to add a reporting process within the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System requiring local educational agencies to report the enrollment of pupils of military families, as defined. The bill would require the State Department of Education to include pupils of military families as an indicator for specified purposes. The bill would prohibit this data from being used to compile reports required by specified federal provisions. By requiring local educational agencies to report this information, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Senate Passage
Jun 2015
Assembly Passage
Aug 2015
Vetoed
Apr 2016
Introduced Feb 24, 2015
Vetoed Apr 25, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2015 · Assembly Aug 31, 2015
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
Jun 2, 2015
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
5
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Apr 25, 2016
Vetoed
Last day to consider Governors veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
upper
Oct 9, 2015
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 9, 2015
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 1, 2015
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2368.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 31, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-1)
assembly
Aug 31, 2015
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 27).
lower
Jul 16, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 16, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 18, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Jun 2, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0)
senate
May 28, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1152.) (May 28).
upper
Apr 8, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 521.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 5, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Feb 24, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Marty Block
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 369
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 369. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline