Ballot materials: translations.
Summary
Existing law requires each county elections official to prepare separate sample ballots for each political party and a separate sample nonpartisan ballot, as specified. Existing law requires the elections official to send to each voter, together with the sample ballot, a voter's pamphlet that contains the written statements of each candidate. Existing law requires the elections officials to provide a Spanish translation to those candidates who wish to have one and requires that the person selected to provide that translation be from a list of approved Spanish-language translators and interpreters of the superior court of the county or from an institution accredited by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges. Existing law requires the public posting of specified voting information at each polling place on the day of each election. Existing law requires the precinct board to post, in a conspicuous location at the polling place, at least one facsimile copy of the ballot with the ballot measures and ballot instructions printed in Spanish and facsimile ballots printed in other languages if a significant and substantial need is found by the elections official. Existing law requires that each translation of the ballot measures and ballot instructions posted at the polling place be provided by a person selected by the elections official from the list of approved translators and interpreters of the superior court of the county or from an institution accredited by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges. This bill would expand the group of acceptable translators for purposes of those provisions to include persons appearing on the Judicial Council Master List, persons qualified by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, persons from an institution accredited by a regional or national accrediting agency recognized by the United States Secretary of Education, and members of certain professional organizations.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Jul 2015
Senate Passage
Apr 2015
Assembly Passage
Jul 2015
Signed into Law
Aug 2015
Introduced Feb 24, 2015
Signed Aug 7, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Apr 16, 2015 · Assembly Jul 9, 2015
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 34
Apr 16, 2015
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
5
Committee
4
Aug 7, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 9, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (74-0-1)
assembly
Jul 1, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 1).
lower
May 14, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Apr 16, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-2)
senate
Apr 8, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 523.) (April 7).
upper
Mar 5, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Feb 24, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Janet Nguyen
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 366
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 366. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline