Placement of children: criminal records check.
Summary
Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services, before issuing a license or special permit to any person to operate or manage a community care facility, including a foster family home, to secure from an appropriate law enforcement agency a criminal record regarding the applicant, as specified. Existing law requires the department to deny an application if the applicant has been convicted of any crime other than a minor traffic violation unless the applicant has been granted an exemption. Existing law prohibits the department from granting criminal records exemptions if a person has been convicted of certain crimes. Existing law also requires the department to implement a resource family approval process, as specified, that includes a criminal records clearance of all adults residing in, or regularly present in, the home. Existing law makes the criminal records exemption criteria applicable to foster care provider applicants applicable to resource family applicants. This bill would authorize the department, or, in the case of a resource family applicant, an early implementation county, to grant a criminal records exemption for a foster care provider applicant or resource family applicant for certain crimes previously ineligible for exemption. The bill would also require, if a foster care provider applicant or resource family applicant has been convicted of an offense that is not specifically eligible or ineligible for exemption, the criminal history to be considered as part of the foster care provider licensing process or resource family approval process. The bill would require the department to consider all reasonably available information when determining whether to grant criminal records exemptions for any community care facility applicant. Existing law requires the county welfare department, prior to temporarily placing a child with a relative or nonrelative extended family member, to consider the results of a criminal records check, as specified. Existing law also requires the county social worker, prior to placing a child in the home of a relative, or the home of any prospective guardian or other person who is not a licensed or certified foster parent, to consider the results of a criminal records check, as specified. Existing law prohibits these placements if the person has been convicted of any crime other than a minor traffic violation, unless an exemption has been granted, as specified. This bill would authorize placement, or temporary placement, as applicable, of the child pending approval of a criminal records exemption if all parties agree that the placement is in the best interests of the child. The bill would also require, if the person has been convicted of an offense that is not specifically eligible or ineligible for exemption, the criminal history to be considered in determining if the placement is in the best interest of the child. By imposing a higher level of service on county employees, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Jun 2016
Senate Passage
Jun 2015
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 23, 2015
Last action Jun 23, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2015
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 33
Jun 2, 2015
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
3
Committee
8
Jun 23, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jun 22, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Jun 21, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 21).
lower
Jun 14, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 15, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 2, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-1)
senate
May 28, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1151.) (May 28).
upper
Apr 15, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 619.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 5, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 23, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 316
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 316. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline