Public employee retirement: contributions.
Summary
The California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) requires a public retirement system, as defined, to modify its plan or plans to comply with the act and, among other provisions, establishes new retirement formulas that may not be exceeded by a public employer offering a defined benefit pension plan for employees first hired on or after January 1, 2013. PEPRA requires new employees of public employers, as specified, who participate in a defined benefit plan to have an initial contribution rate of at least 50% of the normal cost rate for that defined benefit plan, rounded to the nearest 14 of 1%, or the current contribution rate of similarly situated employees, whichever is greater. PEPRA prohibits an employer from paying the employee contribution. The California Constitution generally limits ad valorem taxes on real property to 1% of the full cash value of that property. The California Constitution exempts from that limit an additional ad valorem property tax rate for, among other things, indebtedness approved by the voters of the local entity prior to July 1, 1978, including pension programs. This bill would exempt a city or county that pays its pension costs with revenues from a property tax rate approved by its voters to make payments in support of pension programs and levied in addition to the general property tax rate, and that city's or county's employees, from the above-described prohibition on employer payment of employee contribution, with respect to an employee whose pension is funded by these revenues.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Senate Passage
May 2015
Assembly Passage
Sep 2015
Vetoed
Apr 2016
Introduced Feb 23, 2015
Vetoed Apr 25, 2016
Floor votes · Senate May 4, 2015 · Assembly Sep 12, 2015
How they voted
25–10
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 39
May 4, 2015
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican14
71% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Apr 25, 2016
Vetoed
Last day to consider Governors veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
upper
Oct 10, 2015
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 10, 2015
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 12, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (47-24-7)
assembly
Sep 11, 2015
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 27. Noes 12. Page 2777.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 11, 2015
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 25, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Jun 24, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 24).
lower
May 22, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E., R., & S.S.
lower
May 4, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-10-4)
senate
Apr 28, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 797.) (April 27).
upper
Apr 22, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
Apr 21, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 5, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 23, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Pan
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 292
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 292. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline