Pawnbrokers: compensation: loans.
Summary
Existing law regulates pawnbrokers and sets the maximum compensation charged or received by pawnbrokers on loans to their customers. A knowing violation of the provisions regulating pawnbrokers is a crime. Existing law provides a schedule of maximum charges for 21 loan brackets for the first 3 months of any loan. This bill, in that schedule, would consolidate the 21 loan brackets into 6 and set maximum charges within those brackets. Existing law, among other things, limits the charge for the 4th and subsequent months of a loan to 2.5% per month on the unpaid balance, as specified. This bill would increase the charge limit for the 4th and subsequent months to 3% per month. Existing law permits a loan setup fee of the greater of $5 or 2% of the loan amount, not to exceed $10. This bill would adjust the permitted loan setup fee to the greater of either $5 or 3% of the loan amount, not to exceed $30. Existing law establishes the maximum amount, irrespective of the duration of the loan, that may be charged based on size of pawned articles, as specified, and prohibits a storage charge for any article that can be contained within one cubic foot. This bill would permit a pawnbroker to additionally charge a maximum of $1 for handling and storage of any article that can be contained within one cubic foot. Existing law requires a written contract that provides a 4-month loan period for every loan made by a pawnbroker for which goods are received in pledge as security and, under specified circumstances, requires a pawnbroker to notify the borrower at his or her last known address of the termination of the loan period, by a means for which verification of mailing or delivery of the notification can be provided by the pawnbroker, and provides for extending the right of redemption for a period of 10 days from the date that notice is mailed. This bill instead would require a minimum 4-month loan period and would require the pawnbroker to provide that notification to the pledgor at his or her last known mailing or electronic address, by a means for which verification of mailing or, at the sole option of the pledgor, electronic transmission of the notification can be provided by the pawnbroker, as specified. This bill also would require representatives of the pawnbroker industry to poll their members annually to gather data relating to the current financial condition of the California pawn industry. Because a knowing violation of these provisions by a pawnbroker would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2015
Senate Passage
May 2015
Assembly Passage
Jul 2015
Signed into Law
Sep 2015
Introduced Feb 19, 2015
Signed Sep 2, 2015
Floor votes · Senate May 22, 2015 · Assembly Jul 16, 2015
How they voted
34–0
Passed
Total votes 34
May 22, 2015
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Sep 2, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 20, 2015
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jul 16, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (74-0-1)
assembly
Jul 16, 2015
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 8, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (July 8).
lower
Jun 23, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 4, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Jun 4, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
May 22, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0)
senate
May 18, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 5, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 4, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 819.) (April 28).
upper
Apr 15, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 617.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 5, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and JUD.
upper
Feb 19, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Marty Block
DDemocratic
Co
Andy Vidak
RRepublican
Co
BM
Brian Maienschein
DDemocratic
Co
Cathleen Galgiani
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 285
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 285. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline