The California Public Records Act: local agencies: inventory.
Summary
Existing law, the California Public Records Act, requires state and local agencies to make their records available for public inspection, unless an exemption from disclosure applies. The act declares that access to information concerning the conduct of the people's business is a fundamental and necessary right of every person in this state. This bill would require each local agency, except a local educational agency, in implementing the California Public Records Act, to create a catalog of enterprise systems, as defined, to make the catalog publicly available upon request in the office of the person or officer designated by the agency's legislative body, and to post the catalog on the local agency's Internet Web site. The bill would require the catalog to disclose a list of the enterprise systems utilized by the agency, and, among other things, the current system vendor and product, unless, on the facts of the particular case, the public interest served by not disclosing that information clearly outweighs the public interest served by disclosure, in which case the local agency may instead provide a system name, brief title, or identifier of the system. Because the bill would require local agencies to perform additional duties, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. Existing constitutional provisions require a statute that limits the right of public access to meetings or writings of public officials to be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest to be protected by that limitation and the need to protect that interest. This bill would declare that it includes limitations on access, that the interest to be protected is the security of enterprise systems in public agencies, and that the need to protect that interest is that enterprise systems can contain information that, if released to the public, could result in negative consequences. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Senate Passage
May 2015
Assembly Passage
Sep 2015
Signed into Law
Oct 2015
Introduced Feb 19, 2015
Signed Oct 11, 2015
Floor votes · Senate May 7, 2015 · Assembly Sep 4, 2015
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 34
May 7, 2015
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
8
Committee
15
Amendments
1
Oct 11, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 8, 2015
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2564.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 4, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (74-0-1)
assembly
Sep 4, 2015
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 19, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 19).
lower
Aug 17, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 16, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 6, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Jun 30, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 30). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Jun 25, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 18, 2015
Lower · Passed
June 23 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 9, 2015
Lower · Passed
June 16 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 22, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and L. GOV.
lower
May 7, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-2)
senate
May 4, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 884.) (May 4).
upper
Apr 22, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 728.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 15, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 618.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 6, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Mar 5, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and JUD.
upper
Feb 19, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 272
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 272. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline