Juveniles: psychotropic medication.
Summary
Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge children to be dependents or wards of the court under certain circumstances. Existing law authorizes only a juvenile court judicial officer to make orders regarding the administration of psychotropic medications for a dependent or delinquent child who has been removed from the physical custody of his or her parent. Existing law requires that court authorization for the administration of psychotropic medication to a child be based on a request from a physician, indicating the reasons for the request, a description of the child's diagnosis and behavior, the expected results of the medication, and a description of any side effects of the medication. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to adopt rules of court and develop appropriate forms for the implementation of these provisions, as specified. This bill, commencing January 1, 2018, would require that an order authorizing the administration of psychotropic medications to a dependent child or a delinquent child in foster care be granted only upon the court's determination that the administration of the medication is in the best interest of the child and that specified requirements have been met, including a requirement that the prescribing physician confirms that all appropriate laboratory screenings or tests have been performed or ordered for the child, as specified. Under specified circumstances, the bill would prohibit the court from authorizing the administration of psychotropic medications to a child under those provisions, unless a preauthorization review is obtained from a child psychiatrist or behavioral pediatrician, as specified. The bill would impose additional requirements on the court to implement these provisions and to conduct review hearings, as specified. The bill would require the child's social worker to submit a report to the court prior to any review hearing, to include information from the child, the child's caregiver, the public health nurse, and the court-appointed special advocate. By increasing the duties of county social workers, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize psychotropic medication to be administered in an emergency without court authorization. The bill would require court authorization to be sought as soon as practical thereafter, but in no case more than 2 court days after emergency administration of the psychotropic medication. The bill would require the Judicial Council to adopt rules of court and develop appropriate forms to implement these provisions by January 1, 2018. This bill would also require the State Department of Health Care Services, in collaboration with the Judicial Council, to identify resources to assist courts in securing preauthorization reviews in those counties in which there are fewer than 10 practicing child and adolescent psychiatrists in order to avoid undue delays in the authorization of psychotropic medications. This bill would incorporate changes to Section 4064.5 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by both this bill and SB 999, which would become operative only if both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2017, and this bill is chaptered last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
Jun 2015
Assembly Passage
Aug 2016
Vetoed
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 18, 2015
Vetoed Sep 29, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 3, 2015 · Assembly Aug 18, 2016
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
Jun 3, 2015
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
42
Key actions
10
Committee
15
Amendments
3
Sep 29, 2016
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 29, 2016
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 24, 2016
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 34. Noes 5. Page 5323.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 19, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 18, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-5)
assembly
Aug 31, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 27).
lower
Jul 15, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 8, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Jul 1, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Jun 30, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 30).
lower
Jun 15, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and HUM. S.
lower
Jun 3, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0)
senate
Jun 2, 2015
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Jun 1, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1150.) (May 28).
upper
May 5, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 4, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 818.) (April 28).
upper
Apr 22, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 22, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 726.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 14, 2015
Upper · Passed
April 14 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 23, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Feb 26, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and JUD.
upper
Feb 18, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Monning
DDemocratic
Co
David Chiu
DDemocratic
Co
Jim Beall
DDemocratic
Co
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
Co
Mike Gatto
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 253
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 253. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline