Local government finance: property tax revenue allocation: vehicle license fee adjustments.
Summary
Existing property tax law requires the county auditor, in each fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenue to local jurisdictions in accordance with specified formulas and procedures, and generally provides that each jurisdiction shall be allocated an amount equal to the total of the amount of revenue allocated to that jurisdiction in the prior fiscal year, subject to certain modifications, and that jurisdiction's portion of the annual tax increment, as defined. Existing property tax law also requires that, for purposes of determining property tax revenue allocations in each county for the 1992–93 and 1993–94 fiscal years, the amounts of property tax revenue deemed allocated in the prior fiscal year to the county, cities, and special districts be reduced in accordance with certain formulas. It requires that the revenues not allocated to the county, cities, and special districts as a result of these reductions be transferred to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund in that county for allocation to school districts, community college districts, and the county office of education. Beginning with the 2004–05 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, existing law requires that each city, county, and city and county receive additional property tax revenues in the form of a vehicle license fee adjustment amount, as defined, from a Vehicle License Fee Property Tax Compensation Fund that exists in each county treasury. Existing law requires that these additional allocations be funded from ad valorem property tax revenues otherwise required to be allocated to educational entities. This bill would modify these reduction and transfer provisions for a city incorporating after January 1, 2004, and on or before January 1, 2012, for the 2014–15 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, by providing for a vehicle license fee adjustment amount calculated on the basis of changes in assessed valuation. By imposing additional duties upon local tax officials with respect to the allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 97.70 of the Revenue and Taxation Code proposed by AB 448 that would become operative if this bill and AB 448 are both chaptered and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2014
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Senate Passage
Jun 2015
Assembly Passage
Sep 2015
Vetoed
Apr 2016
Introduced Dec 1, 2014
Vetoed Apr 25, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2015 · Assembly Sep 1, 2015
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
Jun 2, 2015
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Apr 25, 2016
Vetoed
Last day to consider Governors veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
upper
Sep 22, 2015
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 22, 2015
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 2, 2015
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2418.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 1, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-1)
assembly
Sep 1, 2015
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 28, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 27).
lower
Jul 16, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 15, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Jun 2, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0)
senate
May 28, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1146.) (May 28).
upper
Apr 8, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 523.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 15, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Dec 1, 2014
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Roth
DDemocratic
Co
Eric Linder
RRepublican
Co
Melissa A. Melendez
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 25
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 25. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline