Sustainable Groundwater Management Act: groundwater adjudication.
Summary
The California Constitution requires that the water resources of the state be put to beneficial use to the fullest extent of which they are capable. Existing law specifies the jurisdiction of the courts. Under existing law, courts may adjudicate rights to produce groundwater and exercise other powers relating to the supervision of a groundwater basin. Existing law authorizes a court to order a reference to the State Water Resources Control Board, as referee, of any and all issues involved in a suit brought in any court of competent jurisdiction in this state for determination of rights to water. This bill would authorize the state to intervene in a comprehensive adjudication conducted as specified in AB 1390 of the 2015–16 Regular Session. Existing law, the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, requires all groundwater basins designated as high- or medium-priority basins by the Department of Water Resources that are designated as basins subject to critical conditions of overdraft to be managed under a groundwater sustainability plan or coordinated groundwater sustainability plans by January 31, 2020, and requires all other groundwater basins designated as high- or medium-priority basins to be managed under a groundwater sustainability plan or coordinated groundwater sustainability plans by January 31, 2022, except as specified. The act authorizes a local agency to request that the department revise the boundaries of a basin. This bill, in an adjudication action to determine rights to groundwater in a basin that is required to have a groundwater sustainability plan under the act, would require the court to manage the proceedings in a manner that minimizes interference with the timely completion and implementation of a groundwater sustainability plan, avoids redundancy and unnecessary costs in the development of technical information and a physical solution, and is consistent with the attainment of sustainable groundwater management within the timeframes established by the act. The bill would authorize an entity that is directed by the court in an adjudication action to file the request that the department revise the boundaries of a basin. The act authorizes the state board to designate certain high- and medium-priority basins as a probationary basin if prescribed criteria are met. The act authorizes the state board to develop an interim plan for a probationary basin if the state board, in consultation with the department, determines that a local agency has not remedied a deficiency that resulted in designating the basin as a probationary basin within a certain timeframe. The act also requires the department, at least every 5 years after initial submission, to review any available groundwater sustainability plan or alternative and the implementation of the corresponding groundwater sustainability program for consistency with the act, including achieving the sustainability goal. The act requires the department to issue an assessment for each basin for which a plan or alternative has been submitted that may include recommended corrective actions to address any deficiencies identified by the department. The bill would prohibit the provisions relating to probationary basins and interim plans from applying to a judgment approved by the court if the judgment is submitted to the department for evaluation and assessment and the department determines that the judgment satisfies the objectives of the act for the basin. The bill would require the department to submit to the court assessments and any recommended corrective actions for these judgments and would require the court, after notice and, if necessary, an evidentiary hearing, to determine whether to amend the judgment to adopt the department's recommended corrective actions. This bill would prohibit a court from approving entry of judgment in an adjudication action for a basin required to have a groundwater sustainability plan under the act unless the court finds that the judgment will not substantially impair the ability of a groundwater sustainability agency, the board, or the department to comply with the act and to achieve sustainable groundwater management.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Senate Passage
May 2015
Assembly Passage
Sep 2015
Signed into Law
Oct 2015
Introduced Feb 13, 2015
Signed Oct 9, 2015
Floor votes · Senate May 26, 2015 · Assembly Sep 10, 2015
How they voted
23–14
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 39
May 26, 2015
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican14
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
34
Key actions
8
Committee
12
Amendments
2
Oct 9, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 11, 2015
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2750.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 10, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (73-2-3)
assembly
Sep 10, 2015
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 1, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 31, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 27).
lower
Aug 17, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 7, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (July 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 30, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 8. Noes 5.) (June 30). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 11, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on W., P., & W. and JUD.
lower
May 26, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-14-2)
senate
May 18, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 5, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 4, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 818.) (April 28).
upper
Apr 14, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 592.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 6, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Feb 26, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on N.R. & W. and JUD.
upper
Feb 13, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 226
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 226. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline