Charter schools: pupils no longer attending.
Summary
Existing law requires a charter school, if a pupil is expelled or leaves the charter school without graduating or completing the school year for any reason, to notify the superintendent of the school district of the pupil's last known address within 30 days, and to, upon request, provide that school district with a copy of the cumulative record of the pupil, including a transcript of grades or report card, and health information. Existing law provides that these provisions apply only to pupils subject to compulsory full-time education. This bill would instead require a charter school, if a pupil is expelled, is dismissed, or leaves the charter school without graduating or completing the school year for any reason, to notify the superintendent of the school district of the pupil's last known address, and the superintendent of the school district within the jurisdiction the charter school is located, within 30 calendar days, and to, upon request, provide that school district with a copy of the cumulative record of the pupil, including a transcript of grades or report card, disciplinary record, and health information. The bill would delete the provision that made these provisions applicable only to pupils subject to compulsory full-time education. To the extent this bill would require a higher level of service from charter school officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also require the parent, guardian, or pupil, if the pupil is emancipated or otherwise legally of age, if the pupil leaves, is expelled, or is dismissed from a charter school without graduating or completing the school year for any reason, to inform the receiving school district or charter school, upon enrollment, of the pupil's status with the previous charter school. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 11, 2015
Last action Feb 1, 2016
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
0
Committee
2
Mar 16, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Feb 19, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Feb 11, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Loni Hancock
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 211
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 211. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline