Tribal-gaming: compact ratification.
Summary
Existing federal law, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, provides for the negotiation and execution of tribal-state gaming compacts for the purpose of authorizing certain types of gaming on Indian lands within a state. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to negotiate and conclude compacts, subject to ratification by the Legislature. Existing law expressly ratifies a number of tribal-state gaming compacts, and amendments to tribal-state gaming compacts, between the State of California and specified Indian tribes. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, as defined, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. This bill would ratify the tribal-state gaming compact entered into between the State of California and the Jamul Indian Village of California, executed on August 8, 2016. The bill would provide that, in deference to tribal sovereignty, certain actions are not projects for the purposes of CEQA. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
Aug 2016
Assembly Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 9, 2015
Signed Sep 12, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Aug 25, 2016 · Assembly Aug 22, 2016
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
Aug 25, 2016
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Sep 12, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 25, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0)
senate
Aug 24, 2016
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 5365.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 24, 2016
Upper · Passed
Urgency clause adopted.
upper
Aug 22, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-2)
assembly
Aug 22, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 9, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (July 8).
lower
May 22, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Apr 28, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 795.) (April 28).
upper
Apr 21, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Feb 19, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Feb 9, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Isadore Hall
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 187
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 187. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline