Pupil testing: high school exit examination: suspension.
Summary
Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, with the approval of the State Board of Education, to develop a high school exit examination in English language arts and mathematics in accordance with state academic content standards. Existing law requires, commencing with the 2003–04 school year and each school year thereafter, each pupil completing grade 12 to successfully pass the high school exit examination as a condition of receiving a diploma of graduation or a condition of graduation from high school. This bill would suspend the administration of the high school exit examination and would remove the high school exit examination as a condition of receiving a diploma of graduation or a condition of graduation from high school for each pupil completing grade 12, for the 2015–16, 2016–17, and 2017–18 school years. The bill would, until July 31, 2018, require the governing board or body of a local educational agency, as defined, and the State Department of Education on behalf of state special schools, to grant a diploma of graduation from high school to any pupil who completed grade 12 in the 2003–04 school year or a subsequent school year and has met all applicable graduation requirements other than the passage of the high school exit examination. Existing law establishes the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress as the statewide system of pupil assessments, under which various assessments are required or authorized to be administered in public schools, as specified. Existing law requires the Superintendent, on or before March 1, 2016, to submit to the state board recommendations on expanding the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress to include additional assessments, for consideration at a regularly scheduled public meeting, and to also submit those recommendations to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature and to the Director of Finance in accordance with specified requirements. This bill would add a new requirement, that the Superintendent convene an advisory panel consisting of specified individuals to provide recommendations to the Superintendent on the continuation of the high school exit examination and on alternative pathways to satisfy specified high school graduation requirements, to those recommendations to be submitted by the Superintendent.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Senate Passage
Jun 2015
Assembly Passage
Sep 2015
Signed into Law
Oct 2015
Introduced Feb 5, 2015
Signed Oct 7, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2015 · Assembly Sep 8, 2015
How they voted
22–10
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 33
Jun 2, 2015
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Oct 7, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2015
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 24. Noes 14. Page 2672.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 8, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-22-5)
assembly
Sep 8, 2015
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 1, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 31, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 27).
lower
Jul 9, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 8, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 1).
lower
Jun 23, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Jun 11, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Jun 2, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-10-1)
senate
May 28, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1148.) (May 28).
upper
Apr 16, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 647.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 6, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Feb 19, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Feb 5, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CL
Carol Liu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 172
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 172. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline