Local government: municipal service agreements: law enforcement services.
Summary
Under existing law, the legislative body of any local agency, defined to mean a county, city, city and county, or public district, may contract with any other local agency for the performance by the latter of municipal services or functions within the territory of the former. Existing law requires any agreement entered into pursuant to this authorization to be for valuable consideration. This bill would require a city that provides law enforcement services through its appropriate departments, boards, commissions, officers, or employees to another city pursuant to a contract or any other agreement to charge that city all the costs that are incurred in providing those law enforcement services, but prohibit the inclusion of any costs that the city providing the services reasonably determines are general overhead costs. The bill would provide that any determination of general overhead costs made by a city providing law enforcement services is subject to judicial review as to the reasonableness of that determination. The bill would apply to contracts or agreements entered into, or renewed, on and after January 1, 2017.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Jun 2016
Senate Passage
May 2016
Assembly Passage
Jun 2016
Signed into Law
Jul 2016
Introduced Feb 19, 2016
Signed Jul 1, 2016
Floor votes · Senate May 5, 2016 · Assembly Jun 23, 2016
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
May 5, 2016
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican14
71% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
5
Committee
6
Jul 1, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 23, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (77-0-1)
assembly
Jun 15, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 15).
lower
May 12, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
May 5, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0-4)
senate
Apr 27, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3699.) (April 27).
upper
Apr 4, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Mar 31, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 3, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 19, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Patricia C. Bates
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1360
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1360. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline