Soil Conservation Fund.
Summary
Existing law establishes the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, otherwise known as the Williamson Act, and authorizes a city or county to enter into 10-year contracts with owners of land devoted to agricultural use, whereby the owners agree to continue using the property for that purpose, and the city or county agrees to value the land accordingly for purposes of property taxation, as specified. Existing law provides a procedure to cancel a contract entered into under these provisions, and provides that the landowner and the Department of Conservation may agree on the cancellation value of the land. Existing law requires cancellation fees, when they are required to be collected, to be transmitted by the county treasurer to the Controller and deposited in the General Fund, except the first $2,536,000 of revenue paid to the Controller in the 2004–05 fiscal year, and any amount approved in the final Budget Act for each fiscal year thereafter, is required to be deposited in the Soil Conservation Fund, and as otherwise specified. Existing law provides that the money in the Soil Conservation Fund is available, when appropriated by the Legislature, for specified programs and administrative costs. This bill would provide that the money in the Soil Conservation Fund is available, upon appropriation by the Legislature, additionally for competitive grants and financial assistance to resource conservation districts to aid in the implementation of state programs or projects that improve soil conservation, carbon sequestration in soil, or moisture retention in soil, or other types of projects that improve the quality of agricultural and related land resources, subject to a specified condition. The bill would require the Department of Conservation to establish this competitive grant program.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Jun 2016
Senate Passage
May 2016
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2016
Last action Jun 23, 2016
Floor votes · Senate May 26, 2016
How they voted
39–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
May 26, 2016
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican14
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
3
Committee
7
Jun 23, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Jun 21, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Jun 6, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
May 26, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (39-0-1)
senate
May 16, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 19, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 18, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3496.) (April 12).
upper
Mar 3, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Feb 19, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Nielsen
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1347
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1347. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline