Judgments: required attendance.
Summary
Existing law requires that judgment upon a person convicted of a felony be pronounced in the personal presence of the defendant unless the defendant requests that judgment be pronounced in his or her absence, as specified, or unless, after the exercise of reasonable diligence to procure the defendant, the court finds that it is in the interest of justice that the judgment be pronounced in his or her absence. This bill would instead require a person convicted of a felony to be present when judgment is pronounced against him or her without exception.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2015
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 22, 2015
Last action Feb 1, 2016
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
1
Committee
4
Apr 22, 2015
Upper · Passed
April 28 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 16, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 13, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 5, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jan 22, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Joel Anderson
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 132
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 132. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline