Pupil discipline: expulsion hearings: county schools.
Summary
Existing law requires the governing board of each school district to establish rules and regulations governing procedures for the expulsion of pupils including, but not limited to, an expulsion hearing and a right to appeal. Existing law requires the county superintendent of schools in counties that operate community schools, in conjunction with superintendents of the school districts within the county, to develop a plan for providing education services to all expelled pupils in that county. This bill would prohibit a school operated by a county office of education from expelling a pupil accused of certain offenses unless the county board of education contracts with the Office of Administrative Hearings or appoints an impartial administrative panel for purposes of an expulsion hearing, as specified. The bill would require that the pupil or the pupil's parent or guardian be provided with notice of the hearing, as specified. The bill would authorize a pupil expelled from a school operated by a county office of education to appeal the hearing officer's or the impartial administrative panel's decision to expel to the county board of education. The bill would require the county superintendent of schools or his or her designee, if the county board of education upholds an expulsion, to provide a written notice of the decision to expel, as specified. The bill would also require the plan for providing education services to all expelled pupils in a county that operates one or more community schools to include pupils expelled by the county board of education. By imposing new duties upon county boards of education, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
May 2016
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2016
Last action Aug 11, 2016
Floor votes · Senate May 31, 2016
How they voted
39–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
May 31, 2016
D
Democratic26
100% Yea
R
Republican14
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
5
Committee
10
Aug 11, 2016
Lower · Passed
August 11 hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Jun 29, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 28, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 22).
lower
Jun 6, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
May 31, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (39-0-1)
senate
May 27, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4007.) (May 27).
upper
Apr 27, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 26, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3607.) (April 20).
upper
Apr 14, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Apr 11, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 3, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 19, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Connie M. Leyva
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1309
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1309. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline