Law schools: unaccredited law school disclosures.
Summary
Existing law requires any law school that is not accredited by the examining committee of the State Bar of California (State Bar) to provide every student with a disclosure statement, subsequent to the payment of any application fee but prior to the payment of any registration fee, that contains, among other things, a statement that the law school is not accredited and the number and percentage of students who have taken and who have passed the first-year law student's examination and the final bar examination in the previous 5 years, or since the establishment of the school, whichever time is less, as specified. This bill would additionally require a law school that is not accredited by the American Bar Association (ABA) to publicly disclose on its Internet Web site, specified information, including tuition costs, class sizes, number of faculty, bar passage data, and employment outcomes for graduates. The bill would define terms for these purposes. The bill would also authorize the State Bar to develop a standard information reporting template. The bill would require specific disclosure information be distributed by the school to all applicants being offered conditional scholarships at the time the scholarship offer is extended.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Jun 2016
Senate Passage
May 2016
Assembly Passage
Jun 2016
Signed into Law
Jul 2016
Introduced Feb 19, 2016
Signed Jul 22, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 30, 2016 · Assembly Jun 16, 2016
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 33
Jun 30, 2016
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Jul 22, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 30, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-2)
senate
Jun 30, 2016
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4655.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jun 16, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-2)
assembly
Jun 16, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 13, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Jun 9, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 8).
lower
May 27, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 12, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 27, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3700.) (April 26).
upper
Apr 18, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 28, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 3, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 19, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Marty Block
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1281
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1281. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline