State Bar: admission: license: pro bono service requirement.
Summary
Existing law, the State Bar Act, requires an applicant for admission and a license to practice law, to meet certain requirements, including, but not limited to, having completed certain legal education in a law school, law office, or judge's chambers, passed an examination in professional responsibility, and passed the general bar examination. Existing law prohibits a person from practicing law in this state unless he or she is an active member of the State Bar. This bill would additionally require an applicant, prior to admission, to complete at least 50 hours of supervised pro bono legal service, as specified, in order to supplement the applicant's legal education with practical legal work experience. Upon completion of the pro bono legal service requirement, the bill would require an applicant and the supervisor, as defined, to complete and sign a form confirming completion of the pro bono service. The bill would require the State Bar to adopt rules for the retention of the certification forms. The bill would authorize the State Bar to create the form upon which an applicant can report completion of pro bono service. The bill would require the State Bar to randomly audit submitted forms to ensure compliance with these provisions. The bill would provide that these provisions apply to all applicants who enter law school on or after January 1, 2018.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
May 2016
Assembly Passage
Aug 2016
Vetoed
Aug 2016
Introduced Feb 18, 2016
Vetoed Aug 29, 2016
Floor votes · Senate May 9, 2016 · Assembly Aug 4, 2016
How they voted
23–7
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 33
May 9, 2016
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican10
70% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Aug 29, 2016
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Aug 29, 2016
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 15, 2016
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 26. Noes 12. Page 4984.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 4, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (36-28-7)
assembly
Aug 4, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 30, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Jun 29, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (June 28).
lower
Jun 23, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 31, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 16, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 9, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-7-3)
senate
May 3, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
May 2, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 3700.) (April 26).
upper
Mar 3, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 18, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Marty Block
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1257
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1257. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline