Employment contracts: adjudication: choice of law and forum.
Summary
Existing law regulates the terms and conditions of labor contracts. Existing law prohibits an employer from requiring an employee or applicant for employment to agree, in writing, to any term or condition that is known by the employer to be illegal. Existing law creates the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, which is under the direction of the Labor Commissioner, and generally commits to the commissioner the authority and responsibility for the enforcement of employment laws. This bill, for contracts entered into, modified, or extended on or after January 1, 2017, would prohibit an employer from requiring an employee who primarily resides and works in California, as a condition of employment, to agree to a provision that would require the employee to adjudicate outside of California a claim arising in California or deprive the employee of the substantive protection of California law with respect to a controversy arising in California. The bill would make any provision of a contract that violates these prohibitions voidable, upon request of the employee, and would require a dispute over a voided provision to be adjudicated in California under California law. The bill would specify that injunctive relief is available and would authorize a court to award reasonable attorney's fees. The bill would provide that adjudication includes litigation and arbitration for purposes of these provisions. The bill would except from these provisions a contract with an employee who was represented by legal counsel, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
May 2016
Assembly Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 18, 2016
Signed Sep 25, 2016
Floor votes · Senate May 12, 2016 · Assembly Sep 1, 2016
How they voted
22–10
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 33
May 12, 2016
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
34
Key actions
8
Committee
14
Amendments
2
Sep 25, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 1, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (48-19-4)
assembly
Aug 31, 2016
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 24. Noes 13. Page 5597.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 31, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 29, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 29, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (August 25).
lower
Aug 24, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Jun 29, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 6.) (June 29).
lower
Jun 21, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 20, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 14, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 27, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 12, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-10-1)
senate
May 9, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 27, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 3700.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 18, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 4, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 29, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 3, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 18, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1241
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1241. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline