Child welfare services: case plans: behavioral health services.
Summary
Existing law requires a county social worker to create a case plan for foster youth within a specified timeframe after the child is introduced into the foster care system. Existing law requires the case plan to be developed considering the recommendations of the child and family team according to specified requirements, including, among others, a requirement that the child be involved in developing the case plan as age and developmentally appropriate. This bill would also require, for a child who has been assessed as needing behavioral health services, the case plan to include a summary or copy of the treatment plan developed for the child, or, if the treatment plan has not yet been finalized, the case plan to indicate that fact and be updated at the next regular court hearing after the treatment plan has been finalized. By imposing this duty on county social workers, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
May 2016
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2016
Last action Aug 11, 2016
Floor votes · Senate May 31, 2016
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
May 31, 2016
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
4
Committee
10
Aug 11, 2016
Lower · Passed
August 11 hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Jun 15, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 6, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
May 31, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0)
senate
May 27, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4006.) (May 27).
upper
Apr 18, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 13, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3518.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 6, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Mar 28, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Mar 23, 2016
Upper · Passed
March 29 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 3, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and JUD.
upper
Feb 18, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike McGuire
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1220
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1220. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline