University of California: Best Value Construction Contracting Pilot Program.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes, through January 1, 2017, a pilot program for the Regents of the University of California to contract for certain types of projects on the university of the University of California based on the best value procedures, as specified. Existing law defines the term "university" to mean the campuses of the University of California, including the medical centers. The law requires, on or before January 1, 2016, the Regents of the University of California to report to specific committees of the Legislature regarding the pilot program, including, among other information, a description of the projects awarded using the best value procedures. This bill would extend the provisions of the pilot program until January 1, 2018, and would repeal the reporting requirement. This bill would modify the definition of the term "university" to mean all locations of the University of California. (2) By extending the requirement that bidders verify specified information under oath, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the scope of an existing crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
May 2016
Assembly Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 18, 2016
Signed Sep 28, 2016
Floor votes · Senate May 9, 2016 · Assembly Aug 25, 2016
How they voted
25–7
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
May 9, 2016
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican11
63% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
7
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Sep 28, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2016
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 30. Noes 7. Page 5475.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 25, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (63-10-2)
assembly
Aug 25, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 3, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 3.) (August 3).
lower
Jun 23, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 22, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 21).
lower
May 16, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
May 9, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-7-3)
senate
Apr 25, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 13, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 3516.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 7, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Apr 4, 2016
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 31, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on V.A.
upper
Mar 3, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on V.A. and JUD.
upper
Feb 18, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1214
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1214. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline