Foster youth.
Summary
Existing law, the California Fostering Connections to Success Act, revises and expands the scope of various programs relating to cash assistance and other services to and for the benefit of certain foster and adopted children, and other children who have been placed in out-of-home care, including children who receive Aid to Families with Dependent Children-Foster Care (AFDC-FC) , Adoption Assistance Program, California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) , and Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment (Kin-GAP) benefits. Among other provisions, the act extends specified foster care benefits to youth up to 21 years of age, if specified conditions are met. Existing law defines a nonminor dependent for these purposes as a foster child who is a current dependent child or ward of the juvenile court, or who is a nonminor under the transition jurisdiction of the juvenile court pursuant to a voluntary reentry agreement, and in accordance with a transitional independent living case plan who has attained 18 years of age while under an order of foster care placement by the juvenile court and is not older than 21 years of age. Existing law defines a nonminor former dependent or ward as a person who meets these criteria who reached 18 years of age while subject to an order for foster care placement, for whom dependency, delinquency, or transition jurisdiction has been terminated, and who is still under the general jurisdiction of the court. This bill would revise the definition of a nonminor dependent and former nonminor dependent to include a person who has not attained 21 years of age, if he or she was adjudged a ward of the court on the basis of criminal activity, was subject to an order for foster care placement at the time the petition to adjudge him or her a ward of the court was filed, and was held in secure confinement when he or she attained 18 years of age. This bill would make conforming changes to allow a court to assume or resume dependency jurisdiction or transition jurisdiction over a nonminor who satisfies this criteria. Because the bill would expand the application of the above county administered programs, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2014
Committee Review
Aug 2015
Senate Passage
Jun 2015
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Dec 1, 2014
Last action Aug 27, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Jun 4, 2015
How they voted
28–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 33
Jun 4, 2015
D
Democratic23
82% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
6
Committee
13
Amendments
1
Aug 27, 2015
Lower · Passed
August 27 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Jul 14, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 1, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 30). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 15, 2015
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUM. S. and JUD.
lower
Jun 4, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (28-0-5)
senate
Jun 2, 2015
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Jun 1, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1145.) (May 28).
upper
Apr 22, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 21, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 619.) (April 14).
upper
Apr 7, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 6, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 416.) (March 24).
upper
Mar 17, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Feb 19, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and JUD.
upper
Feb 4, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jan 15, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Dec 1, 2014
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 9 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 12
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 12. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline