Disability access.
Summary
(1) Existing law prohibits discrimination on the basis of various specified personal characteristics, including disability. Existing law provides that individuals with disabilities are entitled to full and equal access to places to which the general public is invited, subject to specified conditions and limitations. This bill would provide that when there is a conflict or difference between the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and any state law, standard, or regulation relating to the access of individuals with disabilities to any place to which the general public is invited, the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 shall control. (2) Existing law allows a plaintiff to collect statutory damages in a construction-related accessibility claim against a place of public accommodation only if a violation of a construction-related accessibility standard denied the plaintiff full and equal access to the place of public accommodation on a particular occasion, as specified. Existing law reduces a defendant's liability for statutory damages in a construction-related accessibility claim against a place of public accommodation to a minimum of $1,000 for each offense if the defendant demonstrates that it has corrected all construction-related violations that are the basis of a claim within 60 days of being served with the complaint and meets certain requirements, or a minimum of $2,000 for each offense if the defendant has corrected all construction-related violations that are the basis of a claim within 30 days of being served with the complaint and is a small business, as specified. This bill would prohibit a construction-related accessibility claim for statutory damages from being initiated in a legal proceeding against a defendant unless the defendant has been served with a demand letter specifying each alleged violation of a construction-related accessibility standard and the alleged violations have not been corrected within 120 days of service. The bill would provide that a defendant is not liable for statutory damages, costs, or plaintiff's attorney's fees for an alleged violation that is corrected within 120 days of service of a demand letter alleging the violation.
Bill status
died
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2016
Last action Apr 27, 2016
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
0
Committee
3
Apr 27, 2016
Committee
April 26 set for second hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 2. Noes 4. Page 3700.) Reconsideration granted.
upper
Apr 13, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 3, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 18, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 9 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
John M. W. Moorlach
RRepublican
Co
Andy Vidak
RRepublican
Co
Frank Bigelow
RRepublican
Co
James Gallagher
RRepublican
Co
KO
Kristin Olsen
RRepublican
Co
Patricia C. Bates
RRepublican
Co
Richard Roth
DDemocratic
Co
Shannon Grove
RRepublican
Co
William P. Brough
RRepublican
Co
Young O. Kim
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1142
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1142. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline