Property taxation: inflation factor: senior citizens.
Summary
The California Constitution generally limits ad valorem taxes on real property to 1% of the full cash value, as defined, of that property, and provides that the full cash value base may be adjusted each year by an inflationary rate not to exceed 2% for any given year. Existing property tax law implementing this constitutional authority provides that the taxable value of real property is the lesser of its base year value compounded annually by the inflation factor not to exceed 2%, as provided, or its full cash value. Existing property tax law also provides that the taxable value of a manufactured home is the lesser of its base year value compounded annually by an inflation factor not to exceed 2% or its full cash value. This bill would provide that the inflation factor shall not apply to the principal place of residence of a "qualified taxpayer," defined by the bill to mean a person that owns a dwelling as his or her principal place of residence, or a person that owns a manufactured home as his or her principal place of residence, who is 65 years of age or older on the lien date who meets specified requirements. By changing the manner in which local tax officials calculate the taxable value of real property owned by senior citizens, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code requires the Legislature to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2016
Last action May 27, 2016
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
10
Key actions
0
Committee
4
May 27, 2016
Senate · Reported by committee
May 27 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
May 4, 2016
Senate · Referred to committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
May 3, 2016
Senate · Reported by committee
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3698.) (April 27).
Feb 25, 2016
Senate · Referred to committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
Feb 17, 2016
Senate · Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jeff Stone
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1126
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1126. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline