SB 1087 California Senate · 2015-2016 Regular Session

Evidence: production of business records.

Summary
Existing law provides that when a subpoena duces tecum is served upon the custodian of records or other qualified witness of a business in a criminal action in which the business is neither a party nor the place where any cause of action is alleged to have arisen, and the subpoena requires the production of all or any part of the records of the business, it is sufficient compliance therewith if the custodian or other qualified witness, within 5 days after the receipt of the subpoena or within a time otherwise agreed upon, delivers a copy of all the records described in the subpoena to the clerk of the court, the judge, or another person, as specified. Existing law requires that the records be accompanied with an affidavit from the custodian attesting to specified information. Existing law also provides for the service of search warrants for the seizure of business records, as specified. This bill would authorize a custodian of business records to comply with a search warrant for certain business records by delivering a true, legible, and durable copy of all of the records described in the search warrant to the law enforcement agency ordered to execute the search warrant, if the warrant provides for compliance in that manner. The bill would require that the records be delivered within 5 days of receipt of the search warrant or such other time as is specified in the search warrant. The bill would require that the records be accompanied by an affidavit of the custodian of records attesting to the same information that is required with respect to a subpoena duces tecum. Existing law authorizes all reasonable costs, as specified, incurred by a nonparty witness to be charged against the party serving the subpoena duces tecum. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to those provisions.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Jun 2016
Senate Passage
Apr 2016
Assembly Passage
Jun 2016
Signed into Law
Jul 2016
Introduced Feb 17, 2016 Signed Jul 22, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 30, 2016 · Assembly Jun 16, 2016

How they voted

37–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Jun 30, 2016
D Democratic26
24 Yea 2
92% Yea
R Republican14
13 Yea 1
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
23
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Jul 22, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 30, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (37-0-3)
senate
Jun 30, 2016
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4653.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jun 16, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (76-0-2)
assembly
Jun 16, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 9, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 8).
lower
May 26, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 5, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 19, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Apr 18, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3520.) (April 12).
upper
Mar 29, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3314.) (March 29). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 25, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
upper
Feb 17, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Joel Anderson
Joel Anderson
RRepublican
CA
38