SB 1079 California Senate · 2015-2016 Regular Session

DNA evidence: CODIS Hit Outcome Project.

Summary
Existing law, the DNA and Forensic Identification Database and Data Bank Act of 1998, provides that the Department of Justice, through its DNA Laboratory, is responsible for the management and administration of the state's DNA and Forensic Identification Database and Data Bank Program. Existing law prohibits the DNA and forensic identification database and databank from being used as a source of genetic material for testing, research, or experiments by any person, agency, or entity seeking to find a causal link between genetics and behavior or health. This bill would establish the CODIS Hit Outcome Project (CHOP) database in, and would require that the database be administered and managed by, the department. The bill would impose various requirements and restrictions relating to the CHOP database, including, among other things, a requirement that every city, county, or state laboratory participating in CODIS enter into the database data specified by the department upon notification that a CODIS hit has occurred, a prohibition against the CHOP database containing DNA profiles, and a requirement that each law enforcement agency within California responsible for the investigation or prosecution of a case involving a DNA database match to a California offender report to the Department of Justice, through the CHOP database, the status or outcome of that investigative lead. The bill would require a city, county, or city and county to be reimbursed for the cost of reporting that information to the Department of Justice. By imposing a higher level of service on local entities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status in committee 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2016 Last action May 27, 2016
Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
12
Key actions
2
Committee
5
May 27, 2016
Upper · Passed
May 27 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 13, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3521.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 28, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 23, 2016
Upper · Passed
March 29 hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 25, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 17, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors