Sexually exploited minors.
Summary
Existing law, until January 1, 2017, authorizes the Counties of Alameda and Los Angeles, respectively, to create a pilot project, contingent upon local funding, for the purposes of developing a comprehensive, replicative, multidisciplinary model to address the needs and effective treatment of commercially sexually exploited minors, as specified. This bill would extend the operation of this program indefinitely in the County of Alameda. The bill would also expand the definition of a "commercially sexually exploited minor" to include, among others, a minor who has been adjudged a dependent of the juvenile court because he or she is a commercially sexually exploited child, and would create a presumption that, if a minor has been arrested for engaging in prostitution, or is the subject of a petition to adjudge him or her a dependent of the juvenile court because he or she is a commercially sexually exploited child, he or she is a commercially sexually exploited minor for the purposes of that definition. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Alameda.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
Jun 2016
Assembly Passage
Aug 2016
Signed into Law
Sep 2016
Introduced Feb 16, 2016
Signed Sep 26, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2016 · Assembly Aug 22, 2016
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
Jun 1, 2016
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Sep 26, 2016
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2016
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 5496.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 22, 2016
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-1)
assembly
Aug 22, 2016
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 28, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 28).
lower
Jun 13, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 1, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0)
senate
May 31, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
May 27, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4002.) (May 27).
upper
Apr 13, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3521.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 25, 2016
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and APPR.
upper
Feb 16, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Loni Hancock
DDemocratic
Co
Jim Cooper
DDemocratic
Co
Joel Anderson
RRepublican
Co
Lorena Gonzalez
DDemocratic
Co
Tony Thurmond
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1064
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1064. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline