Pupil rights: pregnant and parenting pupils.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires a pupil to be excused from school for specified types of absences and prohibits those excused absences from generating state apportionment payments by deeming them as absences in computing average daily attendance. This bill would include as another type of excused absence, 4 absences per school year to care for a sick child, for which the school is prohibited from requiring a note from a doctor. The bill would authorize the governing board of a school district to adopt a policy that allows a parenting pupil who gives or expects to give birth up to 6 weeks of parental leave and to allow a parenting pupil not giving birth up to 3 weeks of parental leave. The bill would specify that parental leave absences shall not be deemed absences in computing average daily attendance if the governing board of the school district of attendance files with the State Department of Education an expectant and parenting pupil policy that includes procedures for ensuring pupils are provided with schoolwork while on parental leave, and would specify the method for crediting average daily attendance for these pupils. (2) Existing state regulations require an educational institution to treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, and recovery from those conditions in the same manner and under the same policies as any other temporary disability. Existing law requires a school district that receives notification of a pupil's temporary disability to determine whether the pupil will be able to receive individualized instruction, and, if the determination is positive, to provide the individualized instruction, as specified. This bill would require a school district to provide a pupil with a temporary disability as a result of pregnancy with guidelines for makeup work plan development if the option for individualized instruction is not available at the pupil's school or school district. (3) Existing law prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, gender, or other specified characteristics in any program or activity conducted by an educational institution that receives, or benefits from, state financial assistance or enrolls pupils who receive state financial aid. This bill would require a school district to notify pregnant and parenting pupils of specified rights and options available to those pupils, as specified. (4) To the extent that this bill would impose additional duties on school districts, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
Jun 2016
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 11, 2016
Last action Aug 11, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2016
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 33
Jun 2, 2016
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Aug 11, 2016
Lower · Passed
August 11 hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Aug 1, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 29, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 28, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 22).
lower
Jun 9, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Jun 2, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-1)
senate
Jun 1, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
May 31, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 4001.) (May 27).
upper
Mar 29, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 28, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3240.) (March 16).
upper
Feb 25, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Feb 11, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CL
Carol Liu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1014
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1014. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline