Health care: prescription drug costs.
Summary
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 (Knox-Keene Act) , provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance (DOI) . Existing law requires health care service plans and health insurers to file specified rate information with DMHC or DOI, as applicable, for health care service plan contracts or health insurance policies in the individual or small group markets and for health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies in the large group market. This bill would require health care service plans or health insurers that file the above-described rate information to report to DMHC or DOI, on a date no later than the reporting of the rate information, specified cost information regarding covered prescription drugs, including generic drugs, brand name drugs, and specialty drugs dispensed as provided. The information reported would include, but not be limited to, the 25 most frequently prescribed drugs and the 25 most costly drugs by total plan or insurer spending. DMHC and DOI would be required to compile the reported information into a report for the public and legislators that demonstrates the overall impact of drug costs on health care premiums and publish the reports on their Internet Web sites by October 1 of each year. Except for the report, DMHC and DOI would be required to keep confidential all information provided pursuant to these provisions. Because a willful violation of the Knox-Keene Act is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill, effective January 1, 2018, except as provided, would require a manufacturer of a prescription drug to notify in writing state purchasers, health care service plans, health insurers, and pharmacy benefit managers if it is increasing the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug during any 12-month period by 25% or more based upon the wholesale acquisition cost of the drug and pursuant to a specified schedule, or by more than $10,000. The bill, effective January 1, 2018, would require a manufacturer of a prescription drug to notify in writing, 3 days before the commercial availability of the drug, state purchasers, health care service plans, health insurers, and pharmacy benefit managers if it is introducing a new prescription drug to market at a wholesale acquisition cost of $10,000 or more annually or per course of treatment. The bill would require a manufacturer, within 30 days of notification of a price increase, or notification of the introduction to market of a prescription drug that has a wholesale acquisition cost of $10,000 or more annually or per course of treatment, to report specified information regarding the drug price to the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development and would require a manufacturer who fails to provide the required information to be subject to an administrative penalty of $1,000 per day for every day after the 30-day notification period. The bill would also require a pharmacy benefit manager that receives notice of a price increase consistent with these provisions to provide notice of the price increase to its contracting public and private purchasers, as provided. The bill would define "pricing information," as specified, would deem it to be confidential information, as specified, would provide that the information is exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act, and would require or authorize, as specified, other entities to disclose the information under a certain condition. The bill would make the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development the entity charged with implementing and enforcing these provisions and would require that office to publish specified information collected pursuant to these provisions on its Internet Website. The bill would repeal these provisions by January 1, 2022. Existing law requires, for large group health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies, each health care service plan or health insurer to file with DMHC or DOI the weighted average rate increase for all large group benefit designs during the 12-month period ending January 1 of the following calendar year, and to also disclose specified information for the aggregate rate information for the large group market. This bill would add to that disclosure of information for the aggregate rate information for the large group market, the requirement for health care service plans or health insurers to disclose specified information regarding the cost of covered prescription generic drugs but excluding generic specialty drugs, brand name drugs, excluding brand name specialty drugs, and brand name and generic specialty drugs dispensed at a pharmacy, network pharmacy, or mail order pharmacy for outpatient use and regarding the use of a pharmacy benefit manager, as prescribed. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2016
Committee Review
Aug 2016
Senate Passage
Jun 2016
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 11, 2016
Last action Aug 24, 2016
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2016
How they voted
22–8
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 33
Jun 1, 2016
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican10
70% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
7
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Aug 16, 2016
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 15, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 11).
lower
Aug 2, 2016
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Aug 1, 2016
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (June 28).
lower
Jun 21, 2016
Lower · Passed
June 21 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 13, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Jun 1, 2016
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-8-3)
senate
May 31, 2016
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
May 27, 2016
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4001.) (May 27).
upper
Apr 14, 2016
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 3559.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 30, 2016
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Feb 25, 2016
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Feb 11, 2016
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1010
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1010. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline