Juveniles: sealing of records.
Summary
Existing law subjects any person under 18 years of age who commits a crime to the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge that person to be a ward of the court, except as specified. Under existing law, juvenile court proceedings to declare a minor a ward of the court are commenced by the filing of a petition by the probation officer, the district attorney after consultation with the probation officer, or the prosecuting attorney, as specified. Existing law requires the juvenile court to order the petition of a minor who is subject to the jurisdiction of the court dismissed if the minor satisfactorily completes a term of probation or an informal program of supervision, as specified, and requires the court to seal all records in the custody of the juvenile court pertaining to that dismissed petition, except that the prosecuting attorney and the probation department of any county may have access to the records for the limited purpose of determining whether the minor is eligible for deferred entry of judgment. This bill would additionally authorize the prosecuting attorney and the probation department to have access to the records for the limited purpose of determining a minor's eligibility for informal supervision and would authorize the probation department of any county to have access to the records for the limited purpose of meeting federal Title IV-B and Title IV-E compliance. The bill would also authorize the probation department to access the records for the limited purpose of identifying the minor's previous court-ordered programs or placements, as specified. The bill would also authorize a law enforcement agency, probation department, court, or other local agency that has custody of the sealed record to access the record, as specified. This bill would incorporate changes to Section 786 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by both this bill and AB 666, which would become operative only if both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2016, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Assembly Passage
Apr 2015
Senate Passage
Sep 2015
Signed into Law
Sep 2015
Introduced Feb 26, 2015
Signed Sep 30, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Sep 8, 2015 · Assembly Apr 23, 2015
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
Sep 8, 2015
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Sep 30, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2015
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3001.).
lower
Sep 8, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0)
senate
Sep 8, 2015
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 10 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 23, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 23).
upper
May 7, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 23, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-1)
assembly
Apr 16, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Apr 15, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 14).
lower
Apr 9, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Apr 6, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 26, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 989
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 989. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline