Civil law: privacy.
Summary
Existing law requires a person or business conducting business in California, or any state or local agency, that owns or licenses computerized data that includes personal information, as defined, to disclose in specified ways, a breach of the security of the system or data, as defined, following discovery or notification of the security breach, to any California resident whose unencrypted personal information was, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired by an unauthorized person. Existing law requires the disclosure to be made in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, consistent with the legitimate needs of law enforcement, or any measures necessary to determine the scope of the breach and restore the reasonable integrity of the data system. This bill would define "encrypted" for purpose of these provisions to mean rendered unusable, unreadable, or indecipherable to an unauthorized person through a security technology or methodology generally accepted in the field of information technology. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1798.29 of the Civil Code proposed by SB 34 and SB 570 that would become operative if this bill and one or both of those bills are enacted and this bill is enacted last. This bill also would incorporate additional changes to Section 1798.82 of the Civil Code proposed by SB 34 and SB 570 that would become operative if this bill and one or both of those bills are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Sep 2015
Assembly Passage
Jun 2015
Senate Passage
Sep 2015
Signed into Law
Oct 2015
Introduced Feb 26, 2015
Signed Oct 6, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Sep 3, 2015 · Assembly Jun 3, 2015
How they voted
25–8
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Sep 3, 2015
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican11
72% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
34
Key actions
9
Committee
11
Amendments
3
Oct 6, 2015
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 8, 2015
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 63. Noes 11. Page 2946.).
lower
Sep 3, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-8-2)
senate
Sep 3, 2015
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 5 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 8, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (July 7).
upper
Jun 18, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 3, 2015
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (65-7-3)
assembly
May 20, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (May 20).
lower
May 14, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 6, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2015
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 4, 2015
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (April 30).
lower
Apr 27, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Apr 20, 2015
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 6, 2015
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Mar 26, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 27, 2015
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ed Chau
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 964
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 964. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline